🇧🇷Brazil

Fila de Espera para Vistoria de Embarcação e Paralização Operacional

2 verified sources

Definition

PROPESC allows both public (MPA-employed) and private certified inspectors to conduct vessel compliance inspections. However, certification process is slow, and private inspector availability is geographically sparse. Vessel operators report waiting 30–90 days for inspection appointments, during which time vessels are idle or operate in non-compliance. Inspection reports must be filed in SisRGP; system processing delays add 10–15 business days per submission. Peak compliance demand (Jan–Dec 2025–2026) exacerbates bottleneck.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: R$ 50,000–R$ 150,000 per vessel per month in lost fishing revenue during idle/inspection-wait period. Estimated 150–450 vessels affected; assuming average 60-day wait per vessel = R$ 150M–R$ 675M aggregate annual revenue loss across fleet.
  • Frequency: Acute during 2025–2026 compliance ramp-up; ongoing until 2028 program end.
  • Root Cause: Insufficient inspector capacity; slow certification process for private inspectors; manual SisRGP filing creates data-entry bottleneck; no priority scheduling system; geographic concentration of certified inspectors.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Brazilian fishing fleet faces capacity paralysis due to inspection bottlenecks under PROPESC. Decentralized mobile inspection units or online pre-compliance verification could reduce wait times from 30–90 days to 5–10 days, unlocking R$ 100M+ in annual fishing revenue.

Affected Stakeholders

Armadores/Proprietários (suffer revenue loss), Tripulação (idle workers, reduced wages), Inspetores Certificados (insufficient capacity)

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Cancelamento Automático de Autorização de Pesca por Não-Conformidade com PROPESC

R$ 500,000 – R$ 2,000,000+ per vessel (loss of annual fishing revenue); typical commercial fishing vessel generates R$ 1.5M–R$ 5M annually. Estimated 5–15% of Brazilian fishing fleet (150–450 vessels) may miss compliance deadlines based on typical government program adoption rates.

Custos de Integração Dupla de Sistemas (Preps + PesqBrasil) e Retrabalho de Vistoria

R$ 50,000–R$ 150,000 per vessel for initial system integration, inspector fees, and training; R$ 5,000–R$ 15,000 annually for system subscriptions and data management. Estimated 200–400 manual hours per vessel per year for compliance documentation (at R$ 100–200/hour burdened = R$ 20,000–R$ 80,000 per year).

Ausência de Visibilidade de Dados de Conformidade PROPESC até Final de 2025

Indirect: R$ 50,000–R$ 500,000 per vessel in unplanned remediation costs and lost business opportunities due to inability to verify compliance status early. Estimated aggregate loss: R$ 50M–R$ 150M across Brazilian fishing fleet for delays in compliance planning.

Lacunas de Monitoramento e Riscos de Multas por Não-Conformidade (Monitoring Gaps & Penalty Risk)

Estimated R$ 50,000–500,000 per audit finding (SEFAZ penalty range for misreported invoices); potential license suspension (indefinite loss of revenue)

Multas por Falhas em Monitoramento e Documentação de Captura Incidental

LOGIC Evidence: Estimated penalty range R$ 10,000–50,000 per violation (typical environmental compliance penalties in Brasil for fisheries monitoring failures); potential fishery closure costs R$ 500,000–2,000,000+ (industry-wide impact if mandatory bycatch species catches exceed unreported thresholds)

Multas por Violação de Requisitos ICCAT e Falhas de Reporte de Captura

LOGIC Evidence: ICCAT payback obligation (exact amount not specified in results) indicates prior overharvest penalty. Estimated industry-wide reporting non-compliance fine range: R$ 5,000–25,000 per vessel per reporting cycle (quarterly); for 100+ commercial vessels, potential aggregate exposure R$ 500,000–2.5 million annually. Overharvest payback: Estimated R$ 1–3 million+ over 5-year period based on bigeye tuna quota baseline (5,944 tons referenced).

Request Deep Analysis

🇧🇷 Be first to access this market's intelligence