🇧🇷Brazil

Custos de Integração Dupla de Sistemas (Preps + PesqBrasil) e Retrabalho de Vistoria

1 verified sources

Definition

PROPESC mandates Preps (satellite tracking) and PesqBrasil (electronic logbook) adoption on a vessel-by-vessel basis, with different timelines and integration requirements. Vessel operators must contract certified inspectors (public or private), obtain inspections, maintain system subscriptions, and file updated data in Sistema Informatizado do Registro Geral (SisRGP). System redundancy, lack of integrated API, and manual data re-entry across platforms create unnecessary rework. Private inspectors charge inspection fees; certification requirements add delays.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: R$ 50,000–R$ 150,000 per vessel for initial system integration, inspector fees, and training; R$ 5,000–R$ 15,000 annually for system subscriptions and data management. Estimated 200–400 manual hours per vessel per year for compliance documentation (at R$ 100–200/hour burdened = R$ 20,000–R$ 80,000 per year).
  • Frequency: Ongoing annual cost; system integration one-time cost (Year 1 2025–2026); recurring subscription and compliance administration through end of 3-year program.
  • Root Cause: Legacy siloed monitoring systems (Preps managed by MPA, PesqBrasil managed separately); lack of unified compliance API; manual inspection-driven compliance model; no automated inter-system data sync.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Brazilian fishing operators waste 200–400 hours per vessel annually managing two separate monitoring systems and compliance paperwork. Unified compliance platform eliminates duplicate system integration, reducing operational overhead by 40–60%.

Affected Stakeholders

Armadores/Proprietários (bear cost burden), Inspetores Certificados (private sector), Pessoal de Conformidade nas empresas

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Cancelamento Automático de Autorização de Pesca por Não-Conformidade com PROPESC

R$ 500,000 – R$ 2,000,000+ per vessel (loss of annual fishing revenue); typical commercial fishing vessel generates R$ 1.5M–R$ 5M annually. Estimated 5–15% of Brazilian fishing fleet (150–450 vessels) may miss compliance deadlines based on typical government program adoption rates.

Fila de Espera para Vistoria de Embarcação e Paralização Operacional

R$ 50,000–R$ 150,000 per vessel per month in lost fishing revenue during idle/inspection-wait period. Estimated 150–450 vessels affected; assuming average 60-day wait per vessel = R$ 150M–R$ 675M aggregate annual revenue loss across fleet.

Ausência de Visibilidade de Dados de Conformidade PROPESC até Final de 2025

Indirect: R$ 50,000–R$ 500,000 per vessel in unplanned remediation costs and lost business opportunities due to inability to verify compliance status early. Estimated aggregate loss: R$ 50M–R$ 150M across Brazilian fishing fleet for delays in compliance planning.

Lacunas de Monitoramento e Riscos de Multas por Não-Conformidade (Monitoring Gaps & Penalty Risk)

Estimated R$ 50,000–500,000 per audit finding (SEFAZ penalty range for misreported invoices); potential license suspension (indefinite loss of revenue)

Multas por Falhas em Monitoramento e Documentação de Captura Incidental

LOGIC Evidence: Estimated penalty range R$ 10,000–50,000 per violation (typical environmental compliance penalties in Brasil for fisheries monitoring failures); potential fishery closure costs R$ 500,000–2,000,000+ (industry-wide impact if mandatory bycatch species catches exceed unreported thresholds)

Multas por Violação de Requisitos ICCAT e Falhas de Reporte de Captura

LOGIC Evidence: ICCAT payback obligation (exact amount not specified in results) indicates prior overharvest penalty. Estimated industry-wide reporting non-compliance fine range: R$ 5,000–25,000 per vessel per reporting cycle (quarterly); for 100+ commercial vessels, potential aggregate exposure R$ 500,000–2.5 million annually. Overharvest payback: Estimated R$ 1–3 million+ over 5-year period based on bigeye tuna quota baseline (5,944 tons referenced).

Request Deep Analysis

🇧🇷 Be first to access this market's intelligence